[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.82.105. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 2, 1990

Low-Level Lead Exposure and the IQ of ChildrenA Meta-analysis of Modern Studies

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh (Dr Needleman), and the Department of Statistics, Carnegie-Mellon University (Dr Gatsonis), Pittsburgh, Pa.

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh (Dr Needleman), and the Department of Statistics, Carnegie-Mellon University (Dr Gatsonis), Pittsburgh, Pa.

JAMA. 1990;263(5):673-678. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440050067035
Abstract

We identified 24 modern studies of childhood exposures to lead in relation to IQ. From this population, 12 that employed multiple regression analysis with IQ as the dependent variable and lead as the main effect and that controlled for nonlead covariates were selected for a quantitative, integrated review or metaanalysis. The studies were grouped according to type of tissue analyzed for lead. There were 7 blood and 5 tooth lead studies. Within each group, we obtained joint P values by two different methods and average effect sizes as measured by the partial correlation coefficients. We also investigated the sensitivity of the results to any single study. The sample sizes ranged from 75 to 724. The sign of the regression coefficient for lead was negative in 11 of 12 studies. The negative partial r's for lead ranged from —.27 to —.003. The power to find an effect was limited, below 0.6 in 7 of 12 studies. The joint P values for the blood lead studies were <.0001 for both methods of analysis (95% confidence interval for group partial r, —.15±.05), while for the tooth lead studies they were.0005 and.004, respectively (95% confidence interval for group partial r, —.08±.05). The hypothesis that lead impairs children's IQ at low dose is strongly supported by this quantitative review. The effect is robust to the impact of any single study.

(JAMA. 1990;263:673-678)

×