[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 17, 1982

Consent for Publication-Reply

Author Affiliations

University of Arizona Tucson

JAMA. 1982;248(23):3094. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03330230015008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.—  Dr Murray, in discussing the publication of case reports of unusual genetic diseases, brings up the point that such cases are often unique and that maintaining the anonymity of patients may be impossible. He provides some excellent guidelines for dealing with these situations in such a way that publication of the case record is of value both to the patient involved and to the medical community in general.I would suggest that similar guidelines be applied to the publication of all case reports, even when the patient's identity can be adequately concealed. In particular, this would include the suggestions to obtain consent from the patient before submission for publication and providing the patient with a reprint of the article.These measures would serve to enhance doctor-patient communication, since, currently, most patients do not think that cases are published in medical journals. The opportunity for patients to learn about

×