[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
October 26, 1994

Advisory Group Insists on 'Alternative' Voice

JAMA. 1994;272(16):1239-1240. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520160021009

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


THE FIRST FORMAL meeting of the newly designated Advisory Council to the Office of Alternative Medicine (OAM) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Md, was acrimonious almost to the point of failure. That the meeting concluded on a more or less positive note was due only to the fact that some council members apologized for untimely remarks and to the skillful diplomacy of Ruth Kirchstein, MD, the NIH's deputy director.

Among the alternative medical approaches the OAM may study are homeopathy, nutritional therapies, acupuncture, herbal remedies, and interactive mind-body and meditation techniques, along with such specific treatments as, for example, the use of shark cartilage for cancer therapy (JAMA. 1993;270: 1400).

Out of Their Hands  The principal thorn in the advisory committee members' side was the fact that the OAM was preparing to announce the funding of several study centers without asking, as is customary, for the committee's

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview