[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.74.94. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 9, 1990

NIH 'Research Risks Office' Reprimands Hospital Institutional Review Board

JAMA. 1990;263(18):2420. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440180016002

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

IN WHAT is believed to be a unique action, the Office for Protection from Research Risks at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has reprimanded an institutional review board for failing to ensure that all subjects in a clinical trial were informed.

There have been instances when investigators have failed to protect research subjects properly, but none involving institutional review boards, according to Charles R. McCarthy, PhD, director of the research risks office in Bethesda, Md.

McCarthy and the deputy director of the office, Alan L. Sandler, DDS, jointly sent a letter to Peter H. Wolff, MD, chair of the committee on clinical investigation at Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass, pointing out that prerandomization to a study is unacceptable when consent is being sought in only one arm of that study. Prerandomization is a procedure in which patients are randomized to receive the treatments that are being tested before being asked

×