[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.8.87. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 9, 1990

Evaluation of Hematuria in Adults

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Nephrology, Arnett Clinic, Lafayette, Ind.

From the Division of Nephrology, Arnett Clinic, Lafayette, Ind.

JAMA. 1990;263(18):2475-2480. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440180081037
Abstract

GROSS hematuria (GH) or microscopic hematuria (MH) may be a clue to serious urologic disease, including malignancy. However, there is no consensus concerning either the level of MH to evaluate or the extent of the evaluation.1-5 In recent series, 39% to 90% of those with MH on screening urinalysis were not tested further.3-5 In those who were evaluated, an intravenous pyelogram (IVP) and cystoscopy were commonly not performed. With these points in mind, I will review the subject of hematuria in adults.

DEFINITION AND DEMOGRAPHICS OF MH  The marked variations in the reported upper limit of normal for urinary red blood cells (RBCs) in subjects without apparent renal disease are primarily due to the different methods of quantification (Table 1) and to the lack of control of activities just prior to urine collection that may induce transient MH (eg, mild trauma, exercise, viral illness, sexual activity, or digital

×