[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.128.52. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 16, 1990

Quality Assurance

JAMA. 1990;263(19):2679-2681. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440190135073
Abstract

The most important development in quality assurance in the past few years has been a shift in focus from processes of care to outcomes of care. A growing role for governments and large purchasers and an increasing use of large data sets has accompanied this change of focus.

At least three states (Pennsylvania, Iowa, and Colorado) now have a state commission that must collect data on the quality of care in the state's hospitals. All three commissions have chosen an approach based on collecting clinical data that will allow comparison of risk-adjusted outcomes among hospitals. Other states, including Maryland, Ohio, New Hampshire, Washington, and Maine, are engaged in state-level voluntary or official activities aimed at comparing hospital performance, physician activities in small areas, or outcomes of various kinds of care.

Third parties are intensely and aggressively interested in the quality and appropriateness of care. Business coalitions are largely responsible for

×