[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 25, 1990

Bone Imaging: Radionuclide Scan vs MRI-Reply

Author Affiliations

Baylor University Medical Center Dallas, Tex

Baylor University Medical Center Dallas, Tex

JAMA. 1990;264(4):456. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450040044028

In Reply.—  Unfortunately, the bone scan figures used in our article for the metastatic lesion of the sacrum in Fig 1 and the stress fracture of the hip in Fig 6 were transposed. The stress fracture was an anterior view on the bone scan and the sacral metastasis was a posterior view. We agree that the bone scan views as shown in the figures would have been the wrong views for the pathologic findings displayed by MRI. In fact, the correct views were obtained but were printed with the wrong corresponding MRI views. Both bone scintigrams were normal as shown in the figures. We apologize for this mishap.We stand behind our statements regarding the use of radionuclide bone scans compared with MRI. Radionuclide bone scanning is a useful and sensitive study for the global view of the skeleton. There is now well-documented evidence that radionuclide bone scans are