[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.167.149.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 28, 1994

Workforce Planning: Estimating Emergency Physicians and Uncovering Primary Care-Reply

Author Affiliations

University of Wisconsin—Madison

JAMA. 1994;272(24):1900. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520240027031

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —I appreciate the opportunity to respond to Dr Johnson and Dr Radecki.As far as the accuracy of the emergency physician numbers, we believe there are two main explanations. It is my understanding that the ACEP estimate of 27000 is on a full-time-equivalent (FTE) basis, and there may be circumstances where individuals do more than one shift, making the FTE contribution greater than the master file head counts. In addition, it is likely that some of those FTEs are provided by physicians of other specialties in the emergency service setting. I would welcome ACEP validation of these suggestions, as well as elaboration of the range of appropriate emergency service staffing models with emergency physicians, other generalist and specialist physicians, and nonphysician providers.I could not agree more with Radecki on the issue of refinements to using head counts as the primary basis for research and analysis and indicated

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×