[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.52.237. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 5, 1991

The Impact of Specific Toy Warning Labels

Author Affiliations

From The Johns Hopkins Injury Prevention Center (Mss Langlois and Bailey and Mr Teret) and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Ms Wallen and Mr Peeler), Baltimore, Md; and Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Dillwyn (Dr Hershey).

From The Johns Hopkins Injury Prevention Center (Mss Langlois and Bailey and Mr Teret) and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Ms Wallen and Mr Peeler), Baltimore, Md; and Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Dillwyn (Dr Hershey).

JAMA. 1991;265(21):2848-2850. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460210094036
Abstract

According to the 1980 Consumer Product Safety Commission's small parts standard, toys with small parts that pose a choking hazard cannot be marketed for children under the age of 3 years. To comply with the standard, toy manufacturers place age labels on packaging to indicate the ages for which toys with small parts are recommended. We conducted a survey of 199 toy buyers to determine the degree to which they understood such labels as warnings and whether more explicit warning labels would affect toy buyers' willingness to purchase toys with small parts for children between 2 and 3 years of age. Forty-four percent of respondents said they would buy for a child between 2 and 3 years of age a toy with the label "Recommended for 3 and up"; only 5% said they would buy for a young child a toy with the label "Not recommended for below 3—small parts." These findings indicate that a change in the small parts standard to require more specific labeling might substantially reduce potentially hazardous toy purchases.

(JAMA. 1991;265:2848-2850)

×