[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.82.105. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 25, 1995

Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism After Hip Surgery-Reply

Author Affiliations

Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio

JAMA. 1995;273(4):288. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520280031032
Abstract

In Reply.  —The literature on prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip replacement is highly controversial. The overall tone of Dr Megerman's comments reflects the controversy and uncertainty in this area and highlights the need for meta-analysis.We were aware of the different mechanisms of action between intermittent pneumatic compression and static elastic compression. Megerman erroneously assumes, however, that different mechanisms of action translate into different efficacies. We combined these mechanical modalities because of separate crude risks that were no different clinically or statistically. This preliminary analysis consisted of simple tabulation of numerators and denominators for each modality and was determined separately from our more detailed analysis.We carefully considered how to include the few treatment arms that combined pharmacologic and mechanical modalities. As stated in the article, our assignment of these combination groups to the pharmacologic arm was arbitrary but made more clinical sense than assignment to the mechanical

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×