[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.173.253. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1, 1995

Medicine's Position Is Both Pivotal and Precarious in Assisted-Suicide Debate

JAMA. 1995;273(5):363-364. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290015005

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED suicide may become as contentious an issue as abortion.

The escalating battle pits those who say they are protecting a right to life against those who are demanding a right to choose. Opposing camps are virtually identical to those that war over abortion with one notable exception: organized medicine.

"They are two different issues," says American Medical Association (AMA) board of trustees secretary Thomas R. Reardon, MD, an internist in Portland, Ore. "Not even experts agree when life begins," so the AMA maintains that abortion is a medical matter best left between patient and physician. Assisted suicide involves "actively participating in the killing of a living, breathing, functioning, cognitive human being who has a terminal illness," says Reardon.

"For myself and for the AMA this is not a religious issue, it is an ethical issue. Our purpose as physicians is to heal." The option of assisted suicide would tarnish

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×