[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.90.95. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1, 1995

Interactive Medical Video Communication Appears to Be Ahead, but Many Early Efforts Left Behind

JAMA. 1995;273(5):367-368. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290019007

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

EXCITING predictions are being made about the future of interactive video communication in medicine and other fields.

But what about the meantime? Various broadcast approaches of the recent past have met varying degrees of success.

At the end of December, for example, American Medical Television (AMT) ceased regular telecasting after 6 years. Four months earlier—in August 1994— Christopher Whittle's interactive Medical News (television) Network was canceled.

Almost exactly a year before that, in August 1993, the Lifetime Medical Television network ceased operation. And in December 1989, the Physicians' Radio Network (which broadcast on frequency modulation sideband to special radio receivers provided to physicians in each area) went off the air.

Now What?  For the moment, says Larry E. Joyce, president of publishing and multimedia development for the American Medical Association (AMA), the association is focusing on developing more continuing medical education programs on CD-ROM (compact disc, read-only memory), developing an

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×