[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.202.12. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1, 1995

Why Has 'Historic' Public Disclosure of Hospital Performance Data Attracted So Little Attention?

JAMA. 1995;273(9):689-690. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520330019008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

CONSUMERS, COMPETITORS, and payers aren't exactly rushing to snap up the first national reports on hospital performance.

"After a huge amount of hullabaloo nationally, this has become a great nonevent," says Dennis S. O'Leary, MD, president of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

Two years ago, when the Joint Commission announced plans to permit public access to some of the information it compiles during the accreditation process, the move was called historic. But during the first 6 weeks that the reports became available, 97 callers placed orders for 167 of the performance profiles.

"This is bearing out my expectations," O'Leary adds.

Measuring Hospital Performance  The Joint Commission accredits more than 5200 hospitals and 6000 other health care organizations nationwide. Performance reports currently are available for only about 850 hospitals because they're produced according to the Commission's 3-year accreditation cycle. Reports for all Joint Commission—accredited facilities will be completed

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×