[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.43.70. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1, 1983

A new biological marker for depression?

JAMA. 1983;250(1):21. doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340010013006

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The standard for diagnosis of depression in the United States is the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III). To ascertain which DSM criteria patients meet and to assess their symptoms, psychiatrists often rely on psychodiagnostic instruments such as the Beck Depression Inventory, the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia.

Unfortunately, clinicians cannot yet base diagnoses on the results of objectively assessed physiological abnormalities (other than superficially observable phenomena, such as anorexia, psychomotor retardation, and early morning waking in some types of depression).

Hence the quest for definitive biological "marker systems" continues. Perhaps the best-known system at present is the dexamethasone suppression test. On this assay, exogenous dexamethasone administration fails to suppress endogenous cortisol secretion in many different disease states, including some depressions. Another is the urinary assay for the major norepinephrine metabolite, 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol. Others

×