[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 17, 1995

The Relationship Between Physicians' Malpractice Claims History and Later Claims-Reply

Author Affiliations

Urban Institute Washington, DC

JAMA. 1995;273(19):1488-1489. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520430023018
Abstract

In Reply.  —We welcome these interesting letters that raise some technical issues, as does Mr Smarr's Commentary.1 The main scientific protection against error is replication. Already, two different research teams, using different databases from different states, have obtained results similar to those in our article.Dr Wertkin accurately notes that we lacked controls for physicians' practice volume. Volume plausibly influences claims frequency and might even be used in setting premiums. However, such information is difficult to obtain. We considered ourselves fortunate that prior work had painstakingly obtained corresponding data from years of directory listings compiled by the American Medical Association.We agree with Dr Frank that adversarial litigation creates substantial stress for everyone but the lawyers. Malpractice claims are "relatively rare" compared, for example, with automobile claims, especially considering that most insured people drive only part-time. This does not, however, belittle the psychic costs of law, which are one

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×