[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 7, 1995

Economics

Author Affiliations

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

JAMA. 1995;273(21):1670-1671. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520450040020
Abstract

Last year, both the Clinton administration and those who advocated marketplace reforms to restrain health care costs proposed managed care as the principal way to reorganize the financing and provision of medical services. Advocates of managed care asserted that it would improve the quality of care while reducing costs.

Researchers studying both government- and private-sponsored managed care systems have recently published their findings on the capacity of managed care to achieve these goals. Earlier studies of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) had found that 10% to 40% savings could be attained, principally through reduced hospitalizations.1,2 However, researchers were unable to determine whether these savings resulted from HMOs attracting patients who are likely to have lower health care costs and physicians with more parsimonious practice styles or an effect of managed care itself.2 In addition, recent changes in the forms and operation of managed care organizations have made these earlier

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×