[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.114.118. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 21, 1995

Recommendations for Off-Label Use of Intravenously Administered Immunoglobulin Preparations

Author Affiliations

the University Hospital Consortium Expert Panel for Off-Label Use of Polyvalent Intravenously Administered Immunoglobulin Preparations
From the Technology Assessment Program, Clinical Practice Advancement Center, University Hospital Consortium, Oak Brook, Ill (Drs Ratko and Burnett and Mr Matuszewski); Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine (Dr Foulke); and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (Dr Sacher). A member of the panel, Laurence B. Givner, MD, has received honoraria for lectures and fees for consultation from Baxter Healthcare Corp, Glendale, Calif.

JAMA. 1995;273(23):1865-1870. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520470073035
Abstract

Objective.  —To summarize consensus recommendations for off-label uses of standard intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), as developed by a University Hospital Consortium (UHC) Expert Panel. These findings are intended to help guide clinicians in the appropriate and efficient use of IVIG.

Participants.  —The UHC-sponsored panel included eight physicians (board certified in critical care, hematology, immunology, neurology, oncology, pediatrics, or rheumatology) and two hospital pharmacists.

Evidence.  —MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify all English-language review articles (n=201) and original reports (n=1904) on IVIG (human use only, excluding editorials, letters, and comments) published between January 1982 and March 1994. Relevant original reports (250) and review articles (87) were evaluated by the first author (T.A.R.). Extracted data included laboratory and clinical findings, objective measures, or clinical impressions. The evidence quality was graded by study design according to the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Consensus Process.  —Before the panel meeting, a draft literature review and recommendations were produced by one of the authors (T.A.R.). The recommendations herein represent consensus (100% agreement) based on the published evidence.

Conclusions.  —The UHC Expert Panel made specific recommendations for 53 off-label indications and the following general recommendations: (1) Usually IVIG is indicated only if standard approaches have failed, become intolerable, or are contraindicated; (2) IVIG products should be considered therapeutically equivalent and interchangeable; (3) interproduct pharmaceutical differences should be considered with the patient's clinical and physiological status when selecting an IVIG product; and (4) currently, IVIG manufacturers cannot guarantee freedom from viral contamination in the finished product.(JAMA. 1995;273:1865-1870)

×