[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.82.105. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 9, 1983

Staging Laparotomy in Early Ovarian Cancer

Author Affiliations

From the Medicine (Dr Young), Surgery (Dr Sindelar), and Biometric Research Branches (Dr Edwards), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md; the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn (Dr Decker); Department of Gynecology, The University of Texas System Cancer Center, Houston (Drs Wharton and Smith); and the Department of Gynecology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo (Dr Piver).

JAMA. 1983;250(22):3072-3076. doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340220040030
Abstract

Systematic restaging was performed prospectively in 100 patients referred to the Ovarian Cancer Study Group institutions with a diagnosis of "early" (stage Ia-IIb) ovarian cancer. Before referral, only 25% of patients had an initial surgical incision that was adequate to allow complete examination of the pelvis and abdominal cavity. In patients referred to member institutions, 31 (31%) of 100 were found to have a more advanced stage and 23 (77%) of 31 of these actually had stage III disease. Sixty-one percent of the patients had their advanced stage detected by procedures other than a second laparotomy—nine (29%) of 31 by peritoneoscopy, six (19%) of 31 by peritoneal washings, and six (19%) of 31 by lymphangiography. Sites of unsuspected disease are most likely to be pelvic peritoneum, ascites fluid, other pelvic tissue, para-aortic nodes, and the diaphragms. Based on these data, we conclude that the initial staging approaches traditionally used in clinical evaluation of patients with early ovarian cancer are often incomplete and inadequate.

(JAMA 1983;250:3072-3076)

×