[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 12, 1995

Consent for Invasive Procedures in the Newly Deceased-Reply

Author Affiliations

Medical College of Pennsylvania Philadelphia

JAMA. 1995;274(2):129. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530020046026

In Reply.  —Drs Brattebø and Wisborg raise an interesting point about practicing procedures on living patients. However, consent forms for surgery and other procedures are usually worded in such a way that the attending physicians "may utilize assistants" as they see fit. In my practice, this is how many such teaching activities are justified on living patients. I do agree that in circumstances such as the resuscitation of a dying patient, this is a gray area, and the patient and family are often unaware of what actually transpires.On the other hand, I do not think that having a narrow majority of patient families in the studies1 agree to such teaching activities creates a clear mandate to allow for presumed consent for endotracheal intubation. Ideally, a policy should be crafted that all levels of the health care team would be aware of and support. Input into such a policy

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview