[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
August 2, 1995

Withdrawing Life Support in Canada and the United States

Author Affiliations

Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Tex

JAMA. 1995;274(5):384. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530050032025

To the Editor.  —I read with interest the article by Dr Cook and colleagues1 describing factors that influence Canadian health care workers in their decision to withdraw life support from critically ill patients. There are innumerable medical and ethical considerations involved in end-of-life decisions. The authors effectively illustrate that several factors unrelated to patient characteristics influence Canadian health care workers in their decisions, leading to "extreme variability" in how these situations are handled in Canada. The situation is a little different in the United States, however, and the authors do not allude to the differences in making end-of-life decisions that exist between the two countries. An important influence on who actually makes the decision is the allocation of health care resources. Canada has a nationalized system of health care in which limited resources (including intensive care unit [ICU] beds and life support equipment) are allocated on the basis of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview