[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.166.22. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 23, 1995

Incorrect Data.

JAMA. 1995;274(8):612. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530080028036

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

—In the Original Contribution entitled "Variation in Patient Utilities for Outcomes of the Management of Chronic Stable Angina: Implications for Clinical Practice Guidelines," published in the April 19, 1995, issue of The JOURNAL (1995;273:1185-1190), incorrect data appeared in Tables 1 and 3. In Table 1, the percentage of white patients at Duke and Dartmouth should be 29.4% and 100%, respectively. In Table 3, the median standard gamble utility for patients with very mild, mild, or moderate angina should be 0.95, and for those with severe or very severe angina, it should be 0.94.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×