[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 20, 1995

Bayesian Analysis and the GUSTO Trial

Author Affiliations

Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children Dallas

JAMA. 1995;274(11):873. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530110035028
Abstract

To the Editor.  —Drs Brophy and Joseph1 propose the use of Bayesian methods as an alternative to classical methods for statistically analyzing clinical trial data. They indicate (correctly) that researchers want to say, "There's a 98% probability of t-PA mortality being less than SK mortality." Bayesian methods seem to provide this capability, using the same mathematics that allow us to use screening tests to conclude that there is a 92% chance that a patient with a positive test result has a particular disease. However, the mathematics that allow the latter declaration are based on frequencies of occurrence, and even classical statisticians agree with that. When modern Bayesians include a "prior probability distribution for the belief in the truth of a hypothesis," they are actually creating a metaphysical model of attitude change that borrows from the familiar world of frequency-based probabilities. The result (eg, probability oft-PA mortality being lower than

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×