[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.171.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 18, 1995

Ethical Issues in Neurology

Author Affiliations

Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation La Jolla, Calif

 

by James L. Bernat, 364 pp, $49.95, ISBN 0-7506-9501-3, Boston, Mass, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994.

JAMA. 1995;274(15):1245-1246. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530150069038

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Right to death. Physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia. Debate rages in the popular media regarding these topics. Derek Humphry's Final Exit, best described as a suicide manual for patients published by the Hemlock Society, is a best-seller. In several states, at least, there have been ballot initiatives best characterized as right to die. Nationwide polls suggest that some US citizens favor greater control over their circumstances at the end of life. The first document in the patient's chart is often a physician's directive giving explicit instructions regarding extent of treatment.

Ethical Issues in Neurology addresses all these issues from a professional perspective in a clear, comprehensive, and even-handed style. Furthermore, the book is actually interesting in contradistinction to so many papers on ethics, which manage to take the vibrant stuff of life and reduce it to boring technicalities. I was impressed that Bernat assembles the arguments pro and con but then offers

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×