[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.128.52. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1, 1995

Treatment of Nicotine Dependence Is More Better?

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Vermont, Burlington.

JAMA. 1995;274(17):1390-1391. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530170070035
Abstract

The two studies assessing the safety and efficacy of high-dose nicotine patch therapy by Jorenby et al1 and Dale et al2 in this issue of THE JOURNAL raise four questions: Should higher-dose nicotine patches be used? Should nicotine patch therapy be tailored to achieve 100% replacement? How effective is the nicotine patch when given with no physician advice, ie, in over-the-counter—like conditions, in comparison with its effectiveness with physician advice, in prescription-like conditions? How much is its efficacy increased by adding behavioral therapy?

See also pp 1347 and 1353.

Dale et al2 found that 22-mg patches underdose the majority of smokers and that higher doses are safe, provide better withdrawal relief, and appear to increase efficacy. Their results are supported by other studies, which found that standard-dose patches (15 to 22 mg/d) provide less than 100% nicotine replacement3; greater nicotine replacement decreases withdrawal symptoms and increases

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×