[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
January 6, 1984

A Critical Appraisal of the Efficacy of Continuing Medical Education

Author Affiliations

From the Program for Educational Development, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.

JAMA. 1984;251(1):61-64. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340250041018

To determine the efficacy of continuing medical education (CME), we collected 248 original articles describing studies of CME interventions. These articles were reviewed for applicability and scientific credibility by applying preset methodological criteria. Thirteen percent of articles described randomized trials, but only 7% of all articles and 20% of randomized trials assessed the impact of CME on patient outcomes. Seven articles met all our criteria and were reviewed in detail. These studies provide convincing evidence that CME can improve physician behaviors. However, only three of these methodologically sound studies assessed patient outcomes and only one demonstrated any improvement in outcomes.

(JAMA 1984;251:61-64)