[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 14, 1991

Effects of Outcome on Physicians' Judgment of Appropriateness of Care

Author Affiliations

Virginia Mason Medical Center Department of Anesthesiology Seattle, Wash
University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle

Virginia Mason Medical Center Department of Anesthesiology Seattle, Wash
University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle

JAMA. 1991;266(6):794. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470060055013

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —We wholeheartedly agree with Woods and Cook. Recognizing the presence and potential magnitude of outcome bias in physician judgments creates a healthy stimulus for improving the process of retrospective case review. Such improvements will benefit not only the patient and the physician, but also the much broader group of individuals and institutions who engage in the design, provision, and financing of health care.It is important—and exciting—to recognize that effective remedies may be close at hand. As Woods and Cook point out, some of the fundamental concepts and tools for managing outcome bias have already been explored in the literature of experimental psychology and human performance. The next logical step will be to determine whether this basic knowledge can be effectively adapted and extended to meet the specific needs of health care analysis.

×