[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 23, 1991

Diminishing Diagnostic Returns

Author Affiliations

Reading (Pa) Hospital

Reading (Pa) Hospital

JAMA. 1991;266(16):2224. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470160056027
Abstract

To the Editor.  —The article by Dr Johnson1 summarizes a special case of pretest probability (high pretest probability) as a major factor in determining utility of a test. I believe two points in the article deserve comment.First, Fig 1 in Johnson's article fails to account for false-negative results. When the pretest probability of disease is high, the test results may actually detract from diagnostic accuracy. For example, it has been stated in The Journal that "the ultrasound scan actually detracts from diagnostic accuracy in patients with a high (pretest) probability of extrahepatic obstruction."2 As the probability of disease approaches 1, any "negative" (normal) value must be a false-negative. Therefore, the information provided by the test is not zero, but less than zero—a negative number, indicating the test's potential to mislead, reduce diagnostic accuracy, and worsen outcome.Second, Johnson states that "the information provided by a test can

×