[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
June 1, 1984

Medical Ethics' Assault on Medical Values

Author Affiliations

Michigan State University East Lansing

JAMA. 1984;251(21):2792. doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340450019009

To the Editor.—  The criticism of medical ethics recently offered by Clements and Sider echoes that offered by Cheryl Nobel.1 The general point is argued again that the dominant approach to medical ethics—in which solutions to medical-ethical problems are obtained by employing the tools of traditional philosophical ethics—is untenable, chiefly because it is "formal" (according to Clements and Sider) or "acontextual" (according to Nobel).Generally speaking, the authors strike me as philosophically muddled and aiming their arguments at strawmen, but others have made these points well.2-4 An issue that has been overlooked to this point is the clearly empirical claim that is made on behalf of physicians—that medical ethics is of "dubious value" to them.The evidence I have collected as the evaluator of Michigan State's Medical Humanities Program in connection with hospital-based ethics conferences, self-standing courses, integrated course materials, and other activities disconfirms this claim, with respect