[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.121.0. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 4, 1991

Reimbursement Policies Constrain the Practice of Oncology

Author Affiliations

From the US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.

From the US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.

JAMA. 1991;266(21):2996-2999. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470210064033
Abstract

Objective.  —To determine the prevalence of off-label anticancer drug use (ie, using drugs to treat conditions other than those listed on the Food and Drug Administration's approved drug label), the extent of reimbursement denials for these uses, and the effect of denials on the treatment of cancer patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants.  —A three-part questionnaire was sent to a randomized sample of oncologists taken from the 1990 membership of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in March 1990. A response rate of 56% yielded information from 681 oncologists on the drugs they prescribed to 2018 new cancer patients and on those they frequently use in treating 11 specific types of cancer.

Main Outcome Measures.  —The labeled uses of the drugs prescribed and frequently used in chemotherapies were checked against the indications treated to determine whether they were prescribed for off-label uses. Three drug compendia were used as cited sources of off-label drug uses. The extent of reimbursement denials over the last 12 months and their effects on treatments were based on respondent opinions.

Main Results.  —Off-label drug use is prevalent and dominates the chemotherapy regimens of cancers that are more difficult to treat and for which there are no cures or agreements on standardized treatment. Most oncologists reported frustration with shifting reimbursement policies in general and with an increasing rate of denials for some off-label drug uses. Indeed, a surprising number of oncologists claimed that these policies caused them to alter preferred treatments and site of care.

Conclusion.  —These findings suggest the need for public discussion of off-label drug use issues so that appropriate policies can be developed.(JAMA. 1991;266:2996-2999)

×