[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.129.152. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1, 1992

Limiting Specific Interventions in Advance Directives-Reply

Author Affiliations

Harvard Medical School Boston, Mass

Harvard Medical School Boston, Mass

JAMA. 1992;267(1):52. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480010059009

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —I appreciate Dr Lariviere's thoughtful comments, and I agree with many of them. His opening sentence, however, is misleading. My article discussed the limitations of listing specific interventions in advance directives, not "the limitations of health values forms." I am also puzzled by an apparent contradiction. He objects (as I do) to the way in which lists of requested interventions in advance directives might be construed as implying a right to medically inappropriate therapies. Yet, earlier in the letter he suggests a strategy in which a list of interventions should be honored "when the patient's condition seems hopeless."Mr Barnett and I clearly share a commitment to the goal of respecting patients' wishes. But I continue to believe that a thorough exploration of a patient's general preferences for treatment in the event of incapacity will be sufficient in most cases. During the actual period of decision making after

×