[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.130.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 22, 1992

Controversial Costs of Cocaine

Author Affiliations

University of Rochester (NY) School of Medicine and Dentistry

JAMA. 1992;267(4):507. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480040055017
Abstract

To the Editor.  —Phibbs et al1 report some extremely important findings regarding increased neonatal costs of maternal cocaine use. Their findings become more substantial when one realizes that they report only the "tip of the iceberg" when reporting neonatal costs. As they allude to in the last paragraph of their article, the costs of care (and the costs to society) for these infants after their neonatal hospitalizations can be substantial. I concur with their opinion that further study on the long-term consequences of maternal cocaine use is needed.As I read through the study, one question came to mind. Were the physicians for the newborn infants blinded (at least initially) to the maternal drug use history? If they were not blinded, could a positive maternal drug use history have influenced the initial decision as to whether to admit an infant to the neonatal intensive care unit? Although there should

×