[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.168.87. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 13, 1996

Appropriateness of Antiepileptic Drug Level Monitoring

Author Affiliations

Laboratorio Chimica Clinica ed Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliera di Verona Verona, Italy Laboratorio Chimica Clinica ed Ematologia Ospedale Vicenza Vicenza, Italy

JAMA. 1996;275(10):757-758. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530340021018
Abstract

To the Editor.  —Although the article by Dr Schoenenberger and colleagues1 discusses the frequent inappropriateness of antiepileptic drug level monitoring, we suggest that habit and routine, more than diagnostic reasoning, often drive the physician's test requests of therapeutic drug monitoring. The fee-for-service policy of the National Health System in Italy greatly encourages drug monitoring for drugs such as quinidine for which the value of monitoring has not been established.2,3 Since the dosage of quinidine commonly used in Italy is low (400 to 600 mg per day), an eerie situation developed in all the clinical laboratories in which therepeutic monitoring of quinidine is carried out: its concentration rarely reaches the therapeutic interval (ie, 6 to 15 μmol/L [2 to 5 μg/mL]).3To measure this phenomenon, we collected the results of all quinidine assays obtained for inpatients and outpatients during different spans of time since 1990 in four hospital

×