[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.83.210. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 20, 1996

Pain Control and the World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder-Reply

Author Affiliations

McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario

JAMA. 1996;275(11):836. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530350017015
Abstract

In Reply.  —We welcome the opportunity to respond to Drs Reidenberg, Twycross, Lickiss, Ventafridda, and Stjernsward in relation to our article on the WHO analgesic ladder.None of the letters contradict our analysis of the published literature. The two major concerns are that we ignored the importance of the ladder as a political tool and that the benefits of the ladder are so obvious that rigorous randomized control trials are not needed.We endorse all efforts made by the WHO program to increase the availability and acceptability of opioids for the treatment of cancer pain throughout the world, and share Dr Reidenberg's concerns about the limited implementation of the ladder. The focus of our review, however, was not to evaluate the political utility of the ladder, but to assess the evidence on the effectiveness of the ladder when it is used.We acknowledge the difficulties in conducting rigorously controlled studies

×