[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.129.96. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 19, 1992

Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions

Author Affiliations

From the Back Pain Outcome Assessment Team, University of Washington, Seattle (Drs Turner, Ersek, Haselkorn, Kent, Ciol, and Deyo); the Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Dr Turner), Rehabilitation Medicine (Drs Turner and Haselkorn), Medicine (Drs Kent and Deyo), and Health Services (Drs Deyo and Ciol), University of Washington, Seattle; the Central Coast-Spine Institute, San Luis Obispo, Calif (Dr Herron); and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Wash (Drs Haselkorn, Kent, and Deyo). Dr Ersek is now affiliated with the Seattle (Wash) University School of Nursing.

JAMA. 1992;268(7):907-911. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490070089049
Abstract

Objectives.  —To determine success and complication rates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery, predictors of good outcomes, and whether fusion improves success rates of laminectomy for specific low back disorders.

Data Sources.  —English-language journal articles published from 1966 through April 1991, identified through MEDLINE searching (spinalfusion plus limiting terms), bibliography review, and expert consultation.

Study Selection.  —Articles were selected only if they reported at least 1 year of follow-up data enabling the classification of clinical outcomes as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for at least 30 patients.

Data Extraction.  —Two reviewers independently extracted data on patient characteristics, surgical methods, patient outcomes, and quality of study methods.

Data Synthesis.  —Of 47 articles, there were no randomized trials. Four nonrandomized studies compared surgery with and without fusion for herniated disks; three found no advantage for fusion. On average, 68% of patients had a satisfactory outcome after fusion, but the range was wide (16% to 95%), and the satisfactory outcome rate was lower in prospective than in retrospective studies. The most frequently reported complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and chronic pain at the bone graft donor site (9%). Clinical outcomes did not differ by diagnosis or fusion technique, but were worse in studies with a greater number of previously operated patients.

Conclusions.  —For several low back disorders no advantage has been demonstrated for fusion over surgery without fusion, and complications of fusions are common. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare fusion, surgery without fusion, and nonsurgical treatments in rigorously defined patient groups.(JAMA. 1992;268:907-911)

×