[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.128.52. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 24, 1996

The SUPPORT Project and Improving Care for Seriously III Patients

Author Affiliations

University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago, Ill

JAMA. 1996;275(16):1229. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530400015023
Abstract

To the Editor.  —The similarity between the SUPPORT1 intervention and the way many hospitals responded to the Patient Self-determination Act (PSDA) is striking.2 Many hospitals' PSDA policies use clerks, nurses, social workers, and other nonphysician staff to promote advance directive use, often without significant impact. Physicians remain disengaged from these PSDA efforts. The advance directive effort appears to be tolerated by physicians almost because they expect it to have little impact on their usual practice. Likewise, the SUPPORT intervention used computer models, written materials for the medical record, and nurse specialists. Despite the participating physicians' willingness to be part of SUPPORT, I wonder if they simply tolerated the intervention because it did not interfere too much with existing practice, rather than being committed to improving the designated outcomes. It would be interesting to have had a measure that reflected the extent to which participating physicians embraced the notion

×