[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 11, 1992

The Spectrum of Intent in Fatal Child Abuse-Reply

Author Affiliations

Los Angeles County Dept of Health Services
Orange County Health Care Agency Santa Ana, Calif
Los Angeles Inter Agency on Child Abuse

JAMA. 1992;268(18):2518. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490180049022

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —McClain et al state that they did not use the word "intentional" to describe their data on child abuse and neglect, thereby raising an important issue about nomenclature. Their estimate may include cases that are "completely unintentional." They state that "it is not as important to assign blame as it is to identify addressable risk factors."We regret this misquote but are left with a dilemma. What terms should be used to differentiate fatal child abuse and neglect from child deaths unrelated to abuse or neglect? Perhaps it would be more useful to address the "responsibility" of behavior rather than the "intent" of thought.This still leaves us with a judgment as to what distinguishes an individual case of fatal child abuse and neglect from other deaths. For an individual case we may still want to address our judgment of the caretaker's apparent intent as we make our

×