[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.121.0. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1, 1985

Differentiating Dementia From Normal

Author Affiliations

Institute for Psychopharmacologic Research Brookline, Mass

JAMA. 1985;254(17):2407. doi:10.1001/jama.1985.03360170047008
Abstract

To the Editor.—  I read with interest the article by Drs Eslinger et al1 entitled "Neuropsychological Detection of Abnormal Mental Decline in Older Persons." The article described a brief neuropsychological test battery that correctly classified 87% of normal controls and dementias in a validation study, and 89% in a subsequent cross-validation study.The method the authors used to discriminate between the normals and dementias was a stepwise linear discriminant-function analysis that used scores from eight neuropsychological tests as potential predictors. This statistical method maximizes the identification of true-positive and true-negative cases, with a minimum number of predictors, and thus optimizes for a parameter called "test efficiency."2,3 However, my colleagues and I have questioned the value of test efficiency as the appropriate characteristic to be maximized in diagnostic screening tests for dementia.4Galen and Gambino3 stress that high test efficiency is desirable when a disease is serious

×