[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1, 1996

Measles Elimination In the Americas-Reply

Author Affiliations

Pan American Health Organization Washington, DC

JAMA. 1996;275(17):1312. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530410025021

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —We thank Mr Gay and Dr Nokes for their comments concerning our article. In their letter, they question the use of the Pan American Health Organization's operational criterion of the accumulation of 1 birth cohort of susceptible preschool-aged children for determining the proper interval between follow-up campaigns.We agree with Gay and Nokes that an epidemiologically based mathematical model could provide valuable guidance in determining the appropriate interval for follow-up campaigns and that the longer the intervals between such campaigns, the more economical and feasible such a strategy would be. As noted, however, a more conservative strategy is currently recommended that for most countries will call for a "followup" campaign every 4 to 5 years.The present strategy was adopted for 2 principal reasons. Most important is the fact that, until now, measles transmission has never been interrupted over any large contiguous area for more than a matter

×