[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 3, 1993

The Impact of Comorbid and Sociodemographic Factors on Access to Renal Transplantation

Author Affiliations

From The Urban Institute, Washington, DC (Mr Gaylin and Dr Held); Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Port), and the Departments of Epidemiology (Dr Port) and Biostatistics (Dr Wolfe), School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Hunsicker); Division of Immunology and Organ Transplantation, University of Texas Medical School at Houston (Dr Kahan); and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Drs Jones and Agodoa).

JAMA. 1993;269(5):603-608. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500050081030

Objective.  —To assess the impact of sociodemographic factors and comorbid conditions on access to renal transplantation for adult US dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Design.  —Cohort analytic study. Data on comorbid conditions at onset of ESRD were abstracted from patients' medical records and matched to sociodemographic and ESRD data from the United States Renal Data System database.

Setting.  —United States Medicare dialysis population. Patients.—Random, national sample of ESRD patients starting dialysis in 1986 and 1987 (n=4118).

Main Outcome Measure.  —Time to first renal transplant (living or cadaver donor) since onset of ESRD regressed with two nested Cox proportional hazards models, first against sociodemographic factors alone, and then against sociodemographic factors and comorbid conditions.

Results.  —Cardiovascular diseases are most predictive of who receives a transplant; patients with coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, or left ventricular hypertrophy showed lower transplantation rates relative to patients without the disease (relative rate [RR] = 0.65 to 0.80, P<.05 each). Obese patients and patients with peripheral vascular disease also showed lower transplantation rates (RR = 0.65 to 0.75, P<.05 each). Previously reported sociodemographic effects of lower transplantation rates for older patients, women, nonwhite patients, and lower income patients were confirmed (P<.01). Sociodemographic effects remained essentially unchanged when adjusted for comorbid conditions.

Conclusions.  —These findings indicate that sociodemographics have strong independent effects on access to transplantation that cannot be explained away as "surrogate" effects related to comorbid factors. Furthermore, the results suggest that lower mortality rates for transplant recipients relative to dialysis patients are due, in part, to a healthier case mix among patients receiving transplants.(JAMA. 1993;269:603-608)