[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 28, 1986

Joe

Author Affiliations

Tyler, Tex

JAMA. 1986;255(12):1565. doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03370120039005

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

One of my greater pleasures as a urologist is to converse with patients during operative procedures. Since many urologic procedures are performed under local or regional anesthesia, this opportunity comes often. I know that the anesthesiologist has in his arsenal a broad variety of sedatives to allay the anxiety inevitable with surgery, but an anesthesiologist is not always in attendance during procedures done under local anesthesia; even when there is an anesthesiologist in attendance, I inform him that I prefer to sedate my patients with my stories and resort to pharmaceuticals only when I do not get the anticipated relaxation. I have observed that the stress of a surgical procedure, however minor, and the unique relationship between surgeon and patient provide an environment for conversation that brings out emotions and philosophies heretofore suppressed by inhibitions. I know a patient better after half an hour in the operating room than after

×