[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.166.22. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 12, 1996

Firearms and Fatalities-Reply

Author Affiliations

Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee
University of Wisconsin Madison
Wisconsin Department of Justice Madison

JAMA. 1996;275(22):1724-1725. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530460027017
Abstract

In Reply.  —Dr Blackman suggests that the public health paradigm may not be appropriate for motor vehicle crashes and may not be applicable to firearm injuries. We think the public health paradigm is useful for organizing information and identifying prevention strategies along logical and consistent lines. This epidemiologic triad helps us view deaths and injuries as resulting from interactions of the host, vehicle/ agent, and environment. Deaths and injuries can be reduced by changing the relationship of these factors, and the reduced speed limits and improved emergency medical responses that Blackman mentions are good examples of how changes in the environment affect motor vehicle crash injuries.Changes in vehicular design, including air bags, seat belts, and crashworthy occupant compartments, and constructive changes in human behavior by reduced drunk driving have further contributed to the reduction in motor vehicle crash deaths and form the second and third parts of the triad.

×