[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 11, 1986

The White Blood Cell Count as a Risk Factor

Author Affiliations

University of California San Francisco

JAMA. 1986;255(14):1876-1877. doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03370140074010
Abstract

To the Editor.—  The clinical value of a laboratory test depends on more than just a statistically significant difference between two test groups. Grimm et al1 may have overemphasized the prognostic importance of the white blood cell count for coronary heart disease. The unwary may be misled into believing that a blood cell count can actually identify persons at risk.When the test groups are large, even minor differences may be statistically significant. For example, in one study of about 1,300 healthy subjects,2 there was a small but highly significant sex difference in the platelet count (P<.0001). Even so, there are better ways than a platelet count to separate the girls from the boys!

×