[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 24, 1993

Probing the Meaning of Racial/Ethnic Group Comparisons in Crack Cocaine Smoking

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Health Policy and Management (Dr Lillie-Blanton) and Mental Hygiene (Dr Anthony), School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse (Dr Schuster), Baltimore, Md.

JAMA. 1993;269(8):993-997. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500080041029

Objective.  —To probe the meaning of reported racial and ethnic group differences in the prevalence of crack cocaine smoking and to estimate the degree to which crack cocaine smoking is associated with personal factors specific to race/ ethnicity.

Design.  —Through reanalysis of data from the 1988 National Household Survey of Drug Abuse (NHSDA), we compared racial/ethnic group differences in crack cocaine smoking. To hold constant social and environmental risk factors that might potentially confound racial comparisons, we used an epidemiologic strategy that involves poststratification of respondents into neighborhood risk sets. A conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the relative odds of crack use by race/ethnicity.

Patients or Other Participants.  —The 1988 NHSDA interviewed 8814 individuals residing within households in the United States. Subjects were selected using a multistage area probability sampling of all residents aged 12 years and older.

Results.  —Once respondents were grouped into neighborhood clusters, the relative odds (RO) of crack use did not differ significantly for African Americans (RO, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 1.93) or for Hispanic Americans (RO, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.67) compared with white Americans.

Conclusion.  —Findings of race-associated differences are often presented as if a person's race has intrinsic explanatory power. This analysis provides evidence that, given similar social and environmental conditions, crack use does not strongly depend on race-specific (eg, biologic) personal factors. Although the study finding does not refute the previous analysis, it provides evidence that prevalence estimates unadjusted for social environmental risk factors may lead to misunderstanding about the role of race or ethnicity in the epidemiology of crack use. Future research should seek to identify which characteristics of the neighborhood social environment are important and potentially modifiable determinants of drug use.(JAMA. 1993;269:993-997)