[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 16, 1986

Commercial Hair Analysis: Science or Scam?

Author Affiliations

Schaumburg, Ill

JAMA. 1986;255(19):2604. doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03370190087023
Abstract

To the Editor.—  I am very surprised to have seen the publication of such an unscientific and opinionated article as Stephen Barrett's1 appear in JAMA. For a scientist to publish only "high," "normal," and "low" values for the results of the measurement of hair minerals, when he, in fact, could have published the actual raw data in numerical form so a legitimate statistical analysis could have been performed is outrageous and borders on dishonesty. I would very much like to receive the numbers he has and subject them to a multivariate analysis to see where the variation really lies.As a physician who routinely uses hair mineral analysis as a screening tool for evaluation of toxic and essential mineral status, I am very aware that many laboratories measuring hair elements are giving spurious results and also that not all the elements are readily measurable, let alone useful, in health

×