[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.168.204. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 16, 1986

Commercial Hair Analysis: Science or Scam?-Reply

Author Affiliations

Allentown, Pa

JAMA. 1986;255(19):2604. doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03370190087024
Abstract

In Reply.—  Neither specimen had been bleached or permed. Although it would have been ideal to use hair close to the scalp, there was no way to obtain enough of it to create 26 specimens per subject. In 1984, a Food and Drug Administration laboratory ran tests on hair specimens taken 3 and 9 inches from the scalp and prepared similarly to mine, and found that this method can produce homogeneous samples.1 Moreover, the reported values for specimen pairs I sent to each laboratory were generally much closer to each other than to those of the other laboratories. For these reasons, I believe that the variations reported in my study were caused by differences in laboratory techniques and standards rather than the way the specimens were prepared. Two investigations in which paired nape-hair specimens were sent to three laboratories have reported findings similar to mine.2,3Although Dr Walsh

×