[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 24, 1993

Second-Opinion Trial in Patients Recommended for Coronary Angiography

Author Affiliations

The New York (NY) Hospital Cornell Medical Center

JAMA. 1993;269(12):1504. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500120041014
Abstract

To the Editor.  —The recent study by Graboys et al1 regarding the prevalence of unnecessary coronary angiography is a timely one. Last month, three cases appeared in the literature of a complication following femoral vessel catheterization for angiographic procedures: delayed-onset femoral nerve palsy secondary to iliac hematoma.2,3 The result was severe quadriceps paresis with long-term impairment. The risk of local complication is worth noting when discussing the overall necessity of this procedure, especially in patients without coagulation.

×