[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.87.119.171. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 21, 1993

Improving Access to Primary Care-Reply

Author Affiliations

Columbia University New York, NY

JAMA. 1993;269(15):1944. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500150051026

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In Reply.  —Dr Alper raises important issues about the relationships between primary care physicians and managed-care organizations that will have substantial influence on patients' choice and treatment modalities. His warning that patients under managed-care arrangements may change carriers frequently is a fear that warrants attention and evaluation. He implies that the present lowly state of primary care medicine is likely to worsen before it improves. Frankly, I don't have as much faith in health economists as does Dr Alper.Dr Gibb's communication is a useful reminder that the Washington-Alaska-Montana-Idaho program in the Northwest should be reviewed to pinpoint useful lessons about how to organize and provide primary care services more efficiently to underserved populations. I was intrigued by his suggestions that the National Health Service Corps should permit physicians to work part-time to work off their educational debt. And I can see that more attention to the needs of spouses

×