[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 16, 1993

Technology FolliesThe Uncritical Acceptance of Medical Innovation

Author Affiliations

From the Program in Reproductive Epidemiology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco.

JAMA. 1993;269(23):3030-3033. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500230112038
Abstract

"WHAT procedures or practices are we involved in now which will rank with bloodletting as a folly of our time?"1

The need for ongoing assessment of both new and old medical technologies is undisputed.2-6 Nevertheless, much, if not most, of contemporary medical practice still lacks a scientific foundation.7,8 Recent reviews of emerging technologies suggest that little progress has been made in requiring rigorous evidence of efficacy or validity before adoption and dissemination of new technologies.9-11

The road to medical progress has been littered with potholes—or, more accurately, craters. While some new technologies have clearly improved health and reduced costs, others have not. For example, the introduction of D immune globulin dramatically reduced hemolytic disease of the newborn in the United States, as did the use of vaccines for several infectious diseases. Similarly, the advent of laparoscopic tubal sterilization improved the safety of this operation and made

×