[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 23, 1993

Socioeconomic Inequalities in HealthNo Easy Solution

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Psychiatry (Dr Adler), Pediatrics (Drs Adler and Boyce), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Chesney), Medicine (Dr Folkman), and the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (Drs Chesney and Folkman), University of California, San Francisco; and the Department of Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley (Dr Syme).

JAMA. 1993;269(24):3140-3145. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500240084031
Abstract

Objective.  —Socioeconomic status (SES) is strongly associated with risk of disease and mortality. Universal health insurance is being debated as one remedy for such health inequalities. This article considers mechanisms through which SES affects health and argues that a broader and more comprehensive approach is needed.

Data Sources.  —Published articles surveyed using MEDLINE and review articles and bibliographies.

Methods and Results.  —Research is reviewed on the association of SES with health outcomes in different countries, including those with universal health coverage. Socioeconomic status relates to health at all levels of the SES hierarchy, and access to care accounts for little of this association. Other mechanisms are suggested and implications for policy and clinical practice are discussed.

Conclusion.  —Health insurance coverage alone is not likely to reduce significantly SES differences in health. Attention should be paid both in policy decisions and in clinical practice to other SES-related factors that may influence patterns of health and disease.(JAMA. 1993;269:3140-3145)

×