[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.130.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 25, 1996

Trauma Systems at Risk

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

JAMA. 1996;276(12):944-945. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540120022011
Abstract

In 1976, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma published "Optimal Resources for Care of the Seriously Injured."1 These guidelines initially defined the optimal qualities of a trauma center, but quickly evolved into guidelines for a trauma system. From the very beginning the Committee on Trauma was anxious to regionalize trauma care for several reasons. First and foremost was to provide consistent quality care to patients who often present in the middle of the night and/or when there are multiple patients. An analogy has been made between a trauma center and the fire department. Firefighters are required to be in house 24 hours a day to respond immediately to a fire to save property and sometimes even lives. The trauma system guidelines were designed to provide a similar type of response while reducing costs by preventing duplication and minimizing redundancy within the system. Trauma regionalization has become unique

×